Loading
SUMMONS
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
COUNTY OF FAULK
IN CIRCUIT COURT
FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
70DIV. 16-000002
TIMOTHY SCOTT GATES,
Plaintiff, v.
DEBORAH LOUISE MIHOK,
Defendant.
THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT, GREETINGS:
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to answer the Complaint of the Plaintiff, a copy of which is herewith served upon you and to serve a copy of your Answer on the attorney for the Plaintiff, Aaron N. Sandvig, of the firm of Bantz, Gosch & Cremer, L.L.C. at the address below, within thirty (30) days from the date of the service of this Summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service.
IF YOU FAIL TO DO SO, judgment by default may be rendered against you as requested in Plaintiff's Complaint sixty (60) days after the completed service of Plaintiff's Summons and Complaint.
NOTICE
South Dakota law provides that upon the filing of a Complaint for divorce or separate maintenance and upon personal service of the Complaint and Summons on the Defendant, a Temporary Restraining Order shall be in effect against both parties until the final Decree is entered, the Complaint is dismissed, or until further order of the Court.
Either party may apply to the Court for further temporary orders of modification or revocation of the Order.
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER BY ORDER OF THE COURT, YOU AND YOUR SPOUSE ARE:
A. Restrained from transferring, encumbering, concealing or in any way dissipating or disposing of any marital assets without the written consent of the other party or an order of the Court, except as may be necessary in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life. You are to notify the other party of any proposed extraordinary expenditures and to account to the Court for all extraordinary expenditures made after the Temporary Restraining Order is in effect;
B. Restrained from molesting or disturbing the peace of the other party;
C. Restrained from making any changes to any insurance coverage for the parties or any child of the parties without the written consent of the other party or an order of the Court unless the change under the applicable insurance coverage increases the benefits, adds additional property, persons, or perils to be covered, or is required by the insurer.
Dated this 19 day of May, 2016.
BANTZ, GOSCH & CREMER, L.L.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Timothy Scott Gates
305 Sixth Avenue, S.E.
P.O. Box 970
Aberdeen, SD 57402-0970
(605) 225-2232
(605) 225-2497 (fax)
[email protected]
July 15, 22, 29; August 5, 2016 16-01698L